Your cart is currently empty!
+86 15863276370
Ventilation system selection is one of the most important factors affecting environmental control efficiency in modern poultry houses. Different house structures, climate conditions, and production scales require different airflow strategies. Among commercial poultry ventilation solutions, tunnel ventilation and longitudinal ventilation are two widely applied systems.
Tunnel ventilation works by introducing fresh air from one end of the poultry house and exhausting warm air through the opposite end. This creates a high-speed and relatively uniform airflow across the entire house. During hot weather conditions, the increased air movement improves the birds’ cooling sensation and helps reduce heat stress pressure. For high-temperature periods above 28°C, maintaining sufficient airflow velocity, commonly around or above 2.5 m/s under appropriate conditions, can improve thermal comfort when combined with proper cooling systems.
Longitudinal ventilation uses a similar airflow direction along the length of the poultry house but is often designed for houses with different width-to-length ratios or moderate climate conditions. It focuses on maintaining consistent air exchange, controlling humidity, and removing harmful gases such as ammonia.
The choice between these systems depends on several structural factors. Long and narrow poultry houses generally achieve better performance with tunnel ventilation because the airflow distance supports stable air speed. Wider houses or facilities located in moderate climates may benefit from longitudinal ventilation combined with optimized fan placement and air inlet design.
Other factors, including building insulation, fan capacity, cooling pad configuration, stocking density, and local weather conditions, also influence ventilation performance. Therefore, ventilation design should be based on a complete environmental control assessment rather than selecting equipment alone.
By matching airflow systems with poultry house structure and climate requirements, farms can improve temperature stability, enhance energy efficiency, and create a more suitable production environment for broiler growth.


What if reducing your feed conversion ratio (FCR) by just 0.05 could save thousands of dollars every year? Our latest field data confirms that automated precision feeding systems consistently achieve this gain – with no extra labor or complex management. Here’s the math for a standard 10,000‑bird house: At today’s feed price of $450/ton, that’s…
Manual feeding in broiler houses often leads to uneven feed distribution and significant waste—up to 10% of total feed. Automated feeding systems solve this with precision. Using sensors and timers, they deliver exact portions based on bird age and weight, ensuring consistent intake across the flock. This accuracy reduces feed waste by 5–10%, directly cutting…
Leaking nipple drinkers waste water, wet litter, and increase disease risk. Understanding common failure causes helps farm managers quickly fix issues. Primary leak sources include: worn silicone seals (normal wear after 12–18 months), debris trapped in the valve (from poor water filtration), incorrect water pressure (above 0.2–0.3 bar), damaged nipple body (cracks from freezing or…
The payback period of automated feeding systems directly correlates with feed savings achieved. A simple model expresses payback (months) = equipment cost / (annual feed saving × feed price). For a 10,000-bird house, automated feeders typically cut waste by 5–10%, saving 6–12 tons of feed yearly. At $450/ton, that equals $2,700–$5,400 annual saving. With equipment…