Your cart is currently empty!
+86 15863276370
In tunnel-ventilated poultry houses, evaporative cooling pad performance directly impacts bird welfare and productivity during summer. Two critical factors determine system effectiveness: proper pad sizing and water quality management.
Pad Sizing Principles
Pad area should be determined by total tunnel fan capacity, not house dimensions. Industry standard recommends one square foot of six-inch pad for every 350 cfm of fan capacity, equating to a design velocity of 350 ft/min through the pads. Insufficient pad area increases static pressure, reduces airspeed, and diminishes bird cooling. A 25% reduction in pad area can decrease airflow by 10% or more and reduce wind chill effect by 3°F or more. When sizing for high-speed houses (600–800 ft/min air velocity), pad area should be calculated based on total fan capacity at design static pressure of 0.15–0.20 inches.
Water Quality as a Performance Factor
Water quality is equally critical. Evaporative pads require pH between 6 and 8 for optimal performance. As water evaporates, minerals concentrate, forming scale that reduces cooling efficiency. Research shows mineral scale formation can reach 168 grams per 1,000 liters of water consumed. Heavily scaled pads can accumulate over one kilogram of mineral deposits, significantly restricting airflow and reducing evaporative efficiency.
Continuous bleed-off is essential—recommended rate is 1 gallon per hour per linear foot of pad length. Systems should maintain sump pH between 7 and 9 and hardness below 110 ppm. Regular flushing (weekly recommended) prevents scale buildup and preserves pad life.
Synergistic Benefits
Properly sized pads combined with proactive water management deliver measurable returns: cooling efficiencies of 70–80%, incoming air temperature reductions of 5–15°F, reduced bird mortality, and improved feed conversion. The synergy between adequate pad area and clean water circulation ensures consistent cooling performance throughout the hottest periods, protecting flock health and farm profitability.
Need help optimizing your cooling system? Contact us for a customized pad sizing and water management assessment.
For a 1,000‑bird flock, the choice between cage and floor systems affects costs, labor, and risk. For small farms with 1,000 birds, floor rearing is often more practical due to lower entry cost and simpler biosecurity. However, if space is extremely limited and local regulations allow, cages may boost output. Choose based on your target…

Feed storage is an important part of poultry farm management. Moisture, heat, pests, and prolonged storage can affect feed quality and increase avoidable waste. When a sealed feed silo is combined with an automatic feeding system, farms can improve feed handling, reduce exposure to external conditions, and create a more consistent feeding process.
Feed mold contamination is a major concern in poultry farming, leading to nutrient loss and health risks. This study evaluates the effectiveness of sealed feed bins in controlling mold development under practical farm conditions. A comparative trial was conducted over 90 days in two identical broiler houses. House A used conventional open feed storage, while…

Feed constitutes 60–70% of total broiler production costs. Automated feeding systems reduce feed waste through precise portion control, creating a measurable input‑output economic model. Input (Investment) Output (Annual Savings from Feed Alone) Extended Output (Additional Savings) ROI CalculationPayback period (feed savings only) = $13,500 ÷ $2,600 = 5.2 yearsPayback (total savings) = $13,500 ÷ $14,000…