Your cart is currently empty!
+86 15863276370
Evaporative cooling pads are widely used in modern poultry houses to reduce heat stress during hot weather. However, some farms experience limited cooling performance even when cooling pad systems are installed. Understanding the causes of reduced efficiency is essential for improving environmental control and maintaining stable production conditions.
One common reason is insufficient airflow management. Cooling pads rely on proper air movement through the wet surface to achieve effective evaporation. If fan capacity is inadequate, air leakage exists, or ventilation design is not optimized, the cooling effect inside the poultry house may be significantly reduced.
Another important factor is cooling pad condition and maintenance. Dust accumulation, mineral deposits, uneven water distribution, or aging pad materials can reduce water absorption and evaporation efficiency. Regular inspection and cleaning help maintain stable cooling performance.
Water quality and circulation systems also influence cooling efficiency. High mineral content water may cause scaling on the pad surface, reducing air contact with the wet material. A properly designed water supply system with filtration and regular maintenance can improve long-term reliability.
Poultry house structure and environmental conditions should also be considered. Poor insulation, excessive heat entering through roofs or sidewalls, and incorrect air inlet design can increase heat load and reduce the overall impact of cooling systems.
Optimizing evaporative cooling performance requires a combination of equipment selection, ventilation design, maintenance practices, and environmental management. By identifying the limiting factors, poultry producers can improve cooling efficiency, reduce heat stress risks, and create a more stable climate environment for broiler production.

This study builds an ROI model to evaluate automation upgrades for a 10,000-bird floor rearing farm. The model compares total investment (equipment + installation) against annual savings from labor, feed, medication, and mortality reduction. Key inputs: automated feeding system cost – 12,000;manuallaborcost–12,000;manuallaborcost–15/hour; feed waste reduction – 7%; mortality decrease – 2%; medication saving – 20%. Calculation:…
Automated floor rearing systems require a lifecycle cost perspective beyond initial purchase price. Depreciation—spreading equipment cost over its usable life—and technology iteration—rapid upgrades in sensors, controls, and software—shape total ownership expense. A robust analysis model includes five phases: acquisition, installation, operation, maintenance, and residual value. Shorter technology cycles (e.g., every 3–5 years) accelerate depreciation but…
Conventional poultry houses often struggle with heat stress during summer, leading to reduced feed intake and higher mortality. Tunnel ventilation retrofitting offers a proven solution. The technical pathway involves installing high-capacity fans at one end, evaporative cooling pads at the opposite end, and sealing side inlets to create uniform 2–3 m/s airflow. This system lowers…
Effective ventilation is critical for poultry house air quality. This scheme integrates floor-level inlets with ridge outlets, blending natural and mechanical forces. Floor-level inlets, placed along side walls near the litter, allow fresh air to enter at bird level. Ridge outlets, installed at the roof peak, enable warm, stale air to rise naturally. During mild…